JALIL'S NEW ADDRESS
Jalil Muntaqim - AnthonyBottom, 2311826,
850 Bryant St,
San Francisco, CA 94103.

If you want to help Jalil/A. Bottom with his commissary funds send a Postal money order to his new address above.

Jalil 02/21/08:
Challenge to the Black Bourgeoisie and Progressives— Which Way Forward?

 

Jalil's-02/10/08
Musings on U.S. Judicial Repression

 

Jalil's statement to 11/30/07 SF8 Benefit in NYC



Donate to the SF8 now!
Donate to the San Francisco 8!


San Francisco 8 Case
updates from around the world

Panther story from 35 years ago back to cointel-pro program

In 1971 during the height of struggle of the Black Panter Party and the Black Liberation Army a police officer died. 35 years later 8 former Panthers have been charged with his death. The charges were thrown out once due to the torture and police brutality of the San Francisco and New Orleans police departments against the defendents. Read updates.

To read the San Francisco 8 Joint Statement, click here.


Jalil Speaks


    Jalil Video

See this video produced and edited by Eve Goldberg and Claude Marks in November 2002, based on an interview done in August 2000
by John O'Reilly and Nina Dibner.
© 2002 www.freedomarchives.org
(20 minutes). Video hosted by Innocent In Prison Project International;
thank you, IIPPI.


JUNE 27, 2006: Auburn, NY: To watch the video of the forced DNA extraction of Jalil and to read about his parole denial, click here


3/2007 Where We Live - WBAI Sally O’Brien interviews Jalil



Click here to read the solidarity statement from the National Office of the Jericho Movement for Recognition and Amnesty for all U.S. held Political Prisoners/POWs.

Jalil & the San Francisco 8
Ask You to Help!
What is to be done?

1. Anti-Torture Legislation:

In 1909, the Niagara Movement evolved into the NAACP led by W.E.B. Dubois. The principal platform of the NAACP at that time was a struggle to forge an anti-lynching movement. Today, torture in its many forms has become a scourge in America: there is the inhumane use of restraint chairs in jails and prisons, an especially despicable device reminiscent of medieval torture mechanisms; there has been an increase in use of the taser as a weapon to induce confessions and control prisoners, resulting in many deaths, another inhumane torture device.

In the case of the SF8, law enforcement officers employed similar torture techniques, including those used in Vietnam and in Abu Ghraib by U.S. military personnel. The use of torture permeates all facets of the so-called “criminal justice system.” Obviously, like the old anti-lynching platform of the NAACP, the San Francisco 8 call for a national campaign demanding anti-torture legislation on local levels (city councils and state legislatures). The SF8 hold that any form of interrogation that employs the use of water boarding, simulated drowning techniques, cattle prods, tasers, restraint chairs, physical beatings, sensory and sleep deprivation, and psychological coercion must be deemed inhumane and criminal. Therefore, the San Francisco 8 call for all progressive and peace loving people to join in a national campaign on city, state and congressional levels for proclamations and legislation outlawing all forms of torture.


Read the San Francisco 8 Joint Statement, and their other 2 campaigns. Click here.

 

SF8 Court Update:
April 21, 2008


A very large, well-attended rally preceded today's packed San Francisco 8 court hearing. Four of the SF 8—Ray Boudreaux, Richard Brown, Hank Jones and Francisco Torres—joined in leading chants outside the 850 Bryant Street courthouse along with supporters from all over the Bay Area and from other West Coast cities.

The main defense arguments focused on the prosecutors' request to conduct “conditional exams” of 5 witnesses who are old and in poor health and so may not be available at trial. There are legal bases for their testifying in advance of the preliminary hearing and trial. But the defense is arguing that they have full rights to court-ordered discovery pertaining to these witnesses allowing them to prepare to cross-examine them, particularly exculpatory evidence.

Judge Philip Moscone seemed to indicate that the standards for these exams would have to meet trial standards, and that he will address the related discovery issues, but would not issue a written ruling until next week's court hearing.

Defense subpoenas make clear reference to missing exculpatory evidence including “negative comparisons” of latent prints by FBI fingerprint examiners from 1971 and 1975. “I believe that the FBI has been deeply involved in the investigation of the Ingleside murder,” stated defense attorney Chuck Bourdon, who represents Francisco Torres. Bourdon also thinks that all FBI files “have not yet been provided.” Several agencies made reports of negative results over the years. The only positive identification of any latent print (the same latent print) was made recently by an “expert” who was previously disciplined for making false fingerprint reports. Stuart Hanlon, representing Herman Bell in this case, referenced his previous defense of Geronimo Ji-Jaga Pratt—a major target of the FBI's COINTELPRO program. Geronimo “was falsely imprisoned for 27 years by the withholding of FBI exculpatory evidence,” argued Hanlon. “This request demanding full discovery and particularly FBI evidence is more than reasonable in light of this history. This case is no different,” Hanlon pointed out. “The FBI and COINTELPRO are relevant to this case, as COINTELPRO is a continuum through today's Phoenix Taskforce,” argued Jalil Muntaqim's lawyer, Daro Inouye. The Phoenix Taskforce is a multi-agency force that is difficult to formally define. It is known that it includes the US Attorney, the FBI, local police agencies including the SFPD, and the California Department of Justice. It is the umbrella organization that has reopened this case, empaneled various Grand Jury investigations and is overall responsible for this 37-year-old Panther prosecution. Dave Druliner, the lead State prosecutor, replied to defense references to COINTELPRO dismissively as “an aura that exists out there,” and “just something that the defense brings up from time to time.” Apparently congressional investigations revealing the illegality of the FBI's COINTELPRO program in the 1970s are part of that aura.

Committee for the Defense of Human Rights
P.O. Box 90221 Pasadena, CA 91109 (415) 226-1120
E-mail: freethesf8 [at] riseup [dot] net

Message from Cheryl Kates,
Jalil's Parole Appeal Lawyer

Bail Hearings will be held on June 18, 2007. Legally the constitutional rights of the San Francisco 8 are being violated. They are technically pre-trial detainees, which means they are being held for prosecution purposes only and are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. The jail is not allowed to impose punishment as if they were already deemed guilty.

The atmosphere is very bad and they are being treated as if they are very dangerous. They are shackled whenever they are allowed to leave their cells. It has been reported the current state of the detainees is that they are being held in administrative segregation 23 hours a day.

They are being let out of their cells only one hour a day unless they have legal or normal visits which are only allowed on the weekend for a short period of 20-30 minutes. The visits are held behind glass. I am planning to travel to visit the week of August 17-24 and will provide an update then.

The State of NY is currently trying to have Jalil's Article 78 regarding his parole denial appeal dismissed due to the fact he is in California. I have argued against this measure and we are waiting for a decision.
- Cheryl L. Kates Esq.